Thursday, 19 March 2020
Wednesday, 13 September 2017
This fits well his tendency to excoriate self-appointed renegade teachers& spongers (of which there were many) and to praise those who work hard. People duly chosen and appointed to office must work hard in shepherding the flock.
Friday, 8 September 2017
Yet the categorical imperative came to them as to us: 'Be holy, for I, the lord your God am holy.' As Christians we are committed to warring, a striving, following, learning and persevering - to being 'transformed by the renewing of our mind, that we may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.' (Rom 12:2) Is that a forlorn hope? Far from it! Augustine, who understood something about the nature of divine grace learned to pray 'give what you command and command what you will.' Paul writes 'Therefore, my beloved ... work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you to will and do his own pleasure.' (Phil 2:12ff)
Saturday, 20 May 2017
Why Paul did not pull rank on the Thessalonians
At Athens and Corinth they had prayed unceasingly, remembering their work of faith, labour of love and patience of hope in the Lord (1.1.3) God had answered their prayers and in a way that only served to strengthen the bond and deepen the affection. He writes 'For what thanks can we render to God for you, for all the joy with which we rejoice for your sake, night and day praying exceedingly that we may see your face and perfect what is lacking in your faith?' (1.3.9-10)
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
Saving Faith
Tuesday, 28 January 2014
Adopted by the Calvinistic Methodists in Wales , 1823
In 1811, what started in the 18th century as a group of religious societies under the leadership of lay exhorters, began the transition to a connexional denomination under the leadership of ministers and elders,duly examined and ordained on the basis of subscription to the Calvinistic Methodist Confession of Faith of 1823.
In 1933 the Calvinistic Methodists of Wales adopted the title The Presbyterian Church of Wales and took A Short Declaration of Faith as their working doctrinal standard. This brief statement consisting of six articles based on the Apostles' Creed, effectively replaced the Confession of 1823, which became redundant. From this time forward, the Short Declaration became the formal basis for the propagation of theological liberalism in the pulpits. With its adoption, men were officially free to preach aberrant doctrines with impunity.
Men accepted for ordination in the 19th century had once been lay preachers or exhorters in the religious societies. Under the new rules and with the eventual appearance of the 1823 Confession, they could be recognised as ministers of the word and sacraments. Due process amounted to examination, acceptance of the approved system of doctrine and a greater degree of collective oversight. The new arrangement, however, did not demand forfeiture of local freedoms or, indeed, insist on absolute agreement on every point of faith and practice. Those responsible remembered past conflicts and sought a balance between faithfulness and decency and order, on the one hand, and acceptable liberty, on the other.
From the Preface:
'The members of any general society must lay aside their own opinions, in order, by agreement on certain central points, to unite together and, when formed into a society, cooperate in peace and without hindrance. Whoever refuses to do this has no fitness to be a member of any society. No one is required to change his opinions, but simply, as a member of the society, to hold them in abeyance, or else cease to avail himself of the privileges that membership secures. It is unbecoming in any man to think that all will agree with him in their judgement on every subject, or that it is every man's duty to bow to his opinions.
The Calvinistic Methodists in Wales are a very numerous body, and it would be unjust to expect all the members of so large a body to agree in every particular of church organisation. Men differ in the extent of their knowledge and the measure of their grace. They also imbibe prejudices in their early training from which they cannot entirely rid themselves, and which must be tolerated for the sake of the usefulness and peace of the Connexion. To seek points of agreement that will bring all to work peaceably together, is becoming and in itself desirable; for it helps to promote the general welfare of the Connexion.
Official account of the first ordinations
At the Annual Meeting held at Bala* on the 19th and 20th of June, 1811, eight brethren were ordained in the following manner :
First, the oldest and most revered member of the Connexion, John Evans of Bala, read 1 Tim. iii., making, as he read, simple and appropriate remarks on the qualifications required in ministers of the Gospel ; and when he had read the chapter, he prayed in language simple and appropriate to the occasion.
Second, the Rev. T. Charles, of Bala, read, in the hearing of all, the names of those who had been chosen by the Monthly Meetings : — Thomas Jones and John Davies, from Denbighshire ; John Elias and Richard Lloyd, from Anglesey ; Evan Richards, from Carnarvonshire ; John Roberts, from Merionethshire ; Evan Griffiths and William Jones, from Montgomeryshire; and Robert Ellis, from Flintshire, ... The Rev. Thomas Charles requested them to signify by show of hands if they wished him to ask these brethren a few questions ... This being the unanimous wish of the assembly, he asked the following questions, to which he received very appropriate* and satisfactory answers : — What is your belief
1. Concerning the being and attributes of God ?
2. Concerning the Trinity ?
3. Concerning the word of God ?
4. Concerning God's decree and election ?
5. Concerning God's providence ?
6. Concerning the fall and corruption of man ?
7. Concerning the moral law ?
8. Concerning the Person of Christ ?
9. Concerning the offices of Christ ?
10. Concerning the sacrifice of Christ and redemption ?
11. Concerning justification ?
12. Concerning the Person of the Holy Ghost ?
13. Concerning the work of the Holy Ghost in the plan of salvation ?
14. Concerning the call of the gospel ?
15. Concerning perseverance in grace ?
16. Concerning the resurrection ?
17. Concerning the general judgment?
18. What ordinances do you believe to have been divinely appointed ?
19. What is your belief concerning Baptism and the Lord's Supper—their purpose, use, and signification ?
20. Do you sincerely approve of the church government of the Calvinistic Methodists in Wales ?
21. Do you intend, as far as it lies in your power, and with the Lord's help, to maintain the unity of the Connexion in the form in which the Lord has hitherto so greatly blessed it, and set your faces against all unprofitable and contentious disputes that tend to gender strifes ?
When he had asked these questions and received their simple and intelligent answers, he requested the Connexion to declare, by show of hands, if they chose these brethren to administer the ordinances of Baptism and the Lord's Supper among them. They did so unanimously.
After this the Rev. Thomas Charles asked the brethren —
22. Do you, with full consent of mind, accept the call of the Connexion to administer the ordinances of Baptism and the Lord's Supper, and are you resolved to labour faithfully and diligently, to feed the flock of God by administering to them the divine ordinances with all earnestness, according to the help that God may give you ?
They answered humbly and simply, ' "We do,' and earnestly desired the prayers of the whole Connexion. After this, the aged brother, Robert Jones of Carnarvonshire, addressed a few words of earnest exhortation to them and the Connexion generally, and closed the meeting with a fervent prayer appropriate to the occasion'.
Saturday, 4 May 2013
From 'The Glory of Plodding'
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
Not Fit to Live - Not Fit to Die
The conversion & early ministry of Howell Harris (1714 -1773)
(First published in the Presbyterian Network 2004)
The history of Presbyterianism in England and Wales is the story of two quite different initiatives. The Presbyterian Church of England began with the merger of the United Presbyterian Church and various English and Scottish Presbyterian congregations in 1876. It ended in 1972 with the merger between the Presbyterian Church of England and the Congregational Union of England and Wales to form the United Reformed Church. The history of Presbyterianism in Wales goes back to the Evangelical or Methodist Revival of the 18th century and to Welsh Calvinistic Methodism in particular. It is the combination of the Reformed doctrinal emphasis and the Methodist ethos that gave Welsh Presbyterianism its distinctive character to the end of the 19th century. We call it experimental Calvinism. The story of Welsh Presbyterianism begins in the year 1735 with the conversion of two men, Daniel Rowland and Howell Harris. In this article we trace the conversion of Howell Harris and his early ministry.
In the Devil's Service
Personal Efforts at Reformation
From the Law to Christ
Early Public Ministry
Passion Without Knowledge
Special Gifts
The first gift he received was one of 'similitudes and apt comparisons.' His sermons were all very simple and easily understood by the dullest of his hearers. He used illustrations such as - someone out on the open mountain having lost his way, and darkness overtaking him; or a house on fire with the door locked, and the family refusing to open the door, etc. Such things spiritualised, flowing out scorching hot from the speaker's heart, would leave a wonderful effect on the minds of many of his hearers. He was very acceptable for some weeks. But as the novelty wore away, and when he himself began to particularise, pouncing upon the besetting sins of the age and the particular locality, some were disgusted and others were terrified.
Thursday, 8 November 2012
Friday, 29 June 2012
Body Language
Saturday, 16 June 2012
Home Is Where your Heart Is - reflections on 1 Peter 1:1-2
Saturday, 12 May 2012
Reformed Exegesis and Christian Discourse
William Evans reminds us that confessions are the product of their age and are normative for the communities that produce and interpret them. Exegeting the Confession might be thought to be less exacting than exegeting Scripture. Not so, he tells us, for the problems are the same. For instance, we cannot get back to the original authors' intent and therefore must make of it what we can. We have to 'contextualize' the Confession. This has implications for how we understand subscription and the taking of exceptions.
If the Confession really is the product of the believing community, we might reasonably anticipate that exceptions will be few, not many, minor not major and public not private. If we cannot proceed in the confidence that the men of Westminster said what they meant and meant what they said, we can proceed nowhere at all. Acknowledging the essential difference between inspired an uninspired writings, we must yet affirm that no doctrine of the Confession is of any private interpretation. In the words of Charles Hodge, 'It is no less plain that the candidate has no right to put his own sense upon the words propounded to him. He has no right to select from all possible meanings which the words may bear, that particular sense which suits his purpose.'2 As for revision, unless we (the church) have compelling scriptural reasons for for change, the confession should remain intact as the public statement of faith and practice to which we are bound to subscribe.
In it application to Christian discourse the confession sets the hermeneutical parameters. The interpretive method is set down in the Confession. If subscription is at all meaningful, we should not fear theological parameters but be thankful for them. Nor should we feel the need to break the mould or kick over the traces, whether in the interests of semper reformandum or as a reaction to the anachronistic charge that the Assembly failed to address today's issues. The Confession is 'dated', we know that, but not essentially, otherwise it could have little relevance. What is might be 'guilty' of is by omission not commission, which leaves little need for revision. As a comprehensive and systematic summary of biblical doctrine it sets forth 'supracultural’ truth with great clarity, laying down timeless principles especially relevant to the interpretation of scripture, which is what this article is really about. So while revision is always possible3 the truth summarised and set forth represents both the irreducible deposit and the safe environment in which to carry out exegetical exploration.
A confessional hermeneutic for our purpose therefore, is not primarily about interpreting the confession but about interpreting scripture. It has to do with how we get out of scripture what is in it. The hermeneutic of 'reformed' preaching and literature must necessarily resemble the hermeneutic of the standards in its employment of the principle of scripture being its own interpreter. At a time when it is de rigeur to come at the biblical text from a point on the outside, the proposition that 'The infallible rule of interpretation of scripture is the scripture itself...' draws us back to what is fundamental and essential. Whatever the possible insights of Literary Theory, Social Anthropology, Second Temple Judaism, Discourse Analysis and other disciplines, none constitutes the key to getting out of scripture what is in it.
It goes without saying that this does not remove the necessity of appropriate principles and methods. Where there is a question about the true and full sense of scripture, we employ as our basic tool the analogy of faith so that what is 'not alike clear' 'may be searched and known by other places that speak more clearly.' This is simple but emphatically not simplistic. Comparing texts requires discernment of their doctrinal content and didactic import, which is why we call it the analogy of faith. It is more than a simple comparison of texts. Rather we have to exegete texts in order to know that they are truly comparable as opposed to being superficially similar.
Yet in all this there is room for exegetical disagreement. The Assembly, which was not a hermeneutical monolith, admitted that all places in scripture are not alike plain. Variations of understanding may occur but reassuringly, always within the boundaries of the system of doctrine agreed by the church and set forth in the confession. A confessional hermeneutic provides a necessary, if not infallible, safeguard against exegetical, hermeneutical and doctrinal aberration and provides a safe environment for exploration and discussion about the meaning of texts.
Successful exegesis is not a matter of intuition. Students learning to exegete are often unaware of their hermeneutical baggage and fail to recognise the difference between themselves and the text. Consequently they read their own experience or that of others into it. Distanciation helps us come to grips with our personal hermeneutical predispositions. Eisegesis or reading meaning into the text goes hand in hand with failure to recognise personal interpretive baggage and a predilection for superficial comparison. The idea that because texts are similar-looking or sounding they necessarily speak to the same point is simplistic. These weaknesses, which are neither truly exegetical nor reformed, may combine to create an illusion of understanding but in reality are the consequence of distracting influences and presuppositions. A certain facility and ease of movement in the handling texts can be mistaken for spiritual illumination. Yet the idea that not having to work hard with the text equals inspired insight probably has nothing to do with the Holy Spirit and everything to do with an ability to elevate the incidental to a position of first importance – the genesis of heresy!
2 http://www.reformation21.org/blog/william-b-evans/owards a Confessional Hermeneutic: Some Suggestions
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
The Escondido Theology by John Frame
A weighty service
Friday, 20 January 2012
A soldier goes to heaven
Then came the cancer and with it a return to the Lord. 'I''ve re-found my faith' he said on or first meeting. From the time he knew he had cancer, discipleship became a serious matter. Visits were always the same; lying on the sofa, he would get his Bible, Strong's Concordance and laptop from the glass coffee table and away we would go. It was a quest for good texts, ones he could use in witnessing to his friends; 'Where does it say about God 's law being in our conscience?' Another time, I visited him in the hospital but he was too ill to talk. I made ready to leave when two of his pals turned up. 'Pastor, will you please pray?' The pals had to listen, then I left. He witnessed very clearly to his mother and one of the elders of the church testified that she prayed like a Protestant. I hope she believes like one too. He was not afraid to die. He told the social worker from the hospice that he was going to a better place. A week ago we held the memorial. I preached on Simeon's readiness to die after seeing God's salvation in the face of Jesus Christ. It was a good service. The marines did their thing - very dignified. Then the veterans did theirs, five old men, one played 'taps' and the four others, who looked barely able to lift their rifles, fired three volleys, picked up the shells and gave them to Daniel's mother.. It was all over. For Daniel it all began on December twenty-sixth - the day he died.
Tuesday, 16 August 2011
The covenantal complexion of parables
Sunday, 12 June 2011
Tulip for Beginners
Where have all the flowers gone – or whatever happened to TULIP?
‘Where have all the flowers gone?’ has nothing whatever to do with the song of that name! It simply introduces this short series of articles explaining central teachings of the Reformed Faith. TULIP is an acronym or short way of saying something and stands for the Five Points of Calvinism: Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace and the Perseverance of the Saints.
The Synod of Dort, a council of the Reformed Church of the Netherlands, published the Five Points of Calvinism in 1619. These points or ‘canons’ answered the five points of the Arminian Remonstrance (Protest) of 1610. Arminius and his supporters presented a watered-down version of the reformed teachings but the reformed churches saw the danger and published the Five Points. Since then there have been two camps, the Calvinists and the Arminians.
Total Depravity
When somebody says ‘I’m as good as the next person’, without even realising it, they are saying the exact opposite because the next man is not good at all. The Bible teaches that we are sinful from the inside out. In Romans 6:16, Paul talks about us being ‘slaves to sin’. In Romans 7:18 he makes the remarkable assertion that “in [our] flesh nothing good dwells: for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good, I do not find.”
The problem is that our entire constitution is so affected by sin that we cannot please God. Calvin put it like this; “According to the constitution of our nature, oil might be extracted from a stone sooner than we could perform a good work.’ (Institutes III. 14.5) How different from the utopian optimism of evolutionary thought! So deep-seated and so comprehensive is our depravity that Jeremiah said ‘the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?’ (17:9).
Don’t get it wrong, we all have a moral consciousness but that’s not the point. As Paul said, ‘to will is present with me’ but he concludes ‘the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice’ (Romans 7:19). Total Depravity is the inability of the mind, will and affections to please God. Our Confession of Faith says “By this sin they fell from their original righteousness and communion with God and so became dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the parts and faculties of soul and body.” (Westminster Confession of Faith. VI.II).
It’s pretty miserable isn’t it? Total Depravity puts us in our place and the important thing is that it is only when we know that we are real sinners that we will come before God in reverence, godly fear and penitence of heart. It isn’t bad to feel bad. How can we ever appreciate God’s sovereign grace in our Lord, Jesus Christ, if we do not understand our abject poverty and absolute need?
But where has Total Depravity gone? Is it in the preaching, prayers and worship of the church? Rick Warren, senior pastor of Saddleback Church, San Jose, California the eighth largest congregation in the USA, has a simple answer to the question “What shall I preach this Sunday?” Preachers, he thinks, should be asking, “To whom will I be preaching?” and adds “simply thinking through the needs of the audience will help determine God’s will for the message . . . People’s immediate needs are a key to where God would have you begin speaking on that particular occasion’ (Purpose Driven Church 227).
